🔗 Share this article Boom Time for American Billionaires: Why the Economic Structure Sustains Income Disparity Among countless Americans, the economic climate over the recent five-year span has been challenging. Prices have soared while salaries remains stagnant. Steep mortgage rates have made buying a home a bleak prospect. The jobless rate has been slowly rising. The majority of individuals have reported they're delaying major life decisions, including raising children or switching jobs, because of economic uncertainty. But for a very small group of people, the recent half-decade couldn't have been more successful. The Billionaire Boom The wealth of the world's billionaires increased 54% in 2020, at the climax of the pandemic. And even during all the financial uncertainty, the stock market has only kept rising. This growth has largely benefited just a tiny percentage of Americans: 10% of the population owns 93% of stock market wealth. As uneven as this distribution seems, it's the economic framework working as it is presently configured. "Rich elites have purchased their jets, they've bought their multiple houses and mansions, but now they're acquiring senators and media outlets," stated wealth disparity expert Chuck Collins. "We're now stepping into this other chapter of extreme wealth extraction where the wealthy are taking advantage of the system of inequality." Understanding Wealth Tiers To help others understand what exactly it means to be "rich" in the US, Collins utilizes a concept from journalist Robert Frank who, in a 2007 book on the rich, envisioned the different levels of wealth as "Wealthville" villages: Affluent Town, Lower Richistan, Middle Richistan, Upper Richistan and Billionaireville. To modernize the concept, Collins categorizes these "wealth villages" based on income levels: At the foundation, Affluent Town, are the 10 million Americans who have a family earnings of at least $110,000 and an net worth of over $1.5m. The villages get more select as wealth goes up: Lower Richistan has 2.6 million households who have wealth between $6m and $13m. Middle Richistan has 1.3 million households who have assets worth an average of $37m. Upper Richistan, made up of 130,000 Americans (roughly the size of a small city) has between $60m to $1bn in wealth. Collectively, the residents of these villages make up the top 10% of the wealth income distribution, about 14 million Americans altogether, though their experiences vary dramatically. "You could be in Lower Richistan, and you're still flying in the coach section of a commercial plane," Collins explained. "Whereas in Upper Richistan, you're traveling via a private jet. That's a really separate reality. You fly private, you have no investment in the commercial aviation system. You don't care if the whole system collapses – you're set." Extreme Affluence Consequences The peak in "Richistan" is Billionaireville, which is made up of about 800 American billionaires who are some of the world's wealthiest. The influence that this group has far surpasses those who are simply affluent, let alone the typical citizen who doesn't inhabit "Richistan" at all. But Collins thinks the political catchphrase "abolish billionaires" doesn't capture the real problem and has a "whiff of exterminism" to it. "It's the difference between private conduct and a structure of regulations," Collins explained. "We should be focused on an economic system that funnels so much wealth upward to the billionaires." Fortune Building Strategies To understand how wealth at the billionaire level works, Collins separates it into four parts: acquiring fortune, securing fortune, political capture and hyper-extraction. When many Americans think about wealth, they usually think solely about the first step, Collins said. People can create a limited sum of wealth through creating or operating a successful business, which could get them membership in Affluent Town. But getting to Billionaireville requires significant resources and strategy in those next three steps. Collins describes what he calls the "wealth defense industry": the tax lawyers, accountants and wealth managers who use their expertise to ensure that the super rich are being deliberate about their taxes. "Wealth defense professionals use a broad range of tools such as financial instruments, foreign deposits, secret corporations, non-profit organizations and other methods to hold assets," he details. Political Influence and Hyper-Extraction To advance a wealth defense strategy, a family needs policy assistance. Wealth of over $40m becomes political power, Collins says, and can be used to protect assets and ensure continued growth. The ultimate step is a different kind of wealth accumulation, one that Collins calls "maximum taking" to describe how the wealthy have come to influence nearly every single part of an Americans' everyday life largely through private equity, which allows wealthy individuals to fund private companies. "Private equity is seeking those areas of the economy where they can squeeze things a little bit harder," Collins said. "One thing I don't think people understand is these billionaire private-equity funds are what happens when so much wealth is accumulated in so few hands, and they can essentially pivot and say, 'Where else can we extract profits out of the economy?' Healthcare? Great. Mobile home parks? These people can't go anywhere, [so] you can increase their costs." The Real Consequences The effects of this inequality go beyond the wealth getting wealthier. It's about people facing higher costs for their healthcare, rent and vet bills without seeing any substantial income improvement. And Collins said the suffering and anger of this kind of society can lead to profound dissatisfaction. "The most powerful wealthy elites understand people are being left behind [and] are economically suffering," Collins said, adding that conservative politicians have been good at tapping into a potent "phony populism". Government Truth The paradox, Collins points out in his book, is that political leaders have appointed a succession of billionaires to cabinet positions. Along with affluent innovators who had brief but powerful roles overseeing massive cuts to the federal workforce, other important roles for commerce, treasury, education and the interior are also all billionaires. This political landscape, along with help from congressional allies, helped pass major tax legislation, which will make enduring decreases for the wealthy and corporations. The Path Forward While political parties continue to argue that foreign entry and poor economic deals are the source of everyone's economic problems, "the challenge is: Will the opposing party, which has also been captured by the billionaires and big money, be able to effectively tackle the underlying harms?" Collins said. Progressive politicians, he argues, know what policies are needed to "change wealth distribution", including substantial modifications to the tax system, boosting the minimum wage and supporting labor organizations. "It was so, so close, and the bill really did reflect the will of the majority of people who really want lawmakers to address some of these critical challenges," Collins said. "Wealthy influence is not about developing so much as blocking. It's easier to block than it is to make something substantial take place, but the historical precedent is there. We know what that looks like." Collins is optimistic that there can be change, but said it would require sustained political momentum. "It may be sooner than expected that the balance shifts, and then it really is about sustaining a continuous public campaign to make progress on this profound imbalance we're living in," he said. "We can address this. It is addressable."